|
View By Date
Printable Version of This Page
|
|
Originally designed to promote the columns of anonymous Republican and Democratic
writers, this page is now the home of a variety of columnists which currently
include former Republican Party political director Royal
Masset, environmental reporter Duggan Flanakin,
former San Antonio Light Capitol reporter Ed Sills,
and general all-around curmudgeon Edd O'Donnell.
Each columnist brings decades of experience to the table.

|
May 15, 2013      10:17 AM
SILLS: OL' "POP CULTURE" INTERVIEWED AFTER PERRY ATTACK
Tongue in cheek response as Pop Culture cites others from his tribe like "Father Time" and "Pop Art" and of course, "Mother Nature"
“Their
values and principles have worked for a century now. And for Pop Culture to
come in and try to tear that up, which happens to be the flavor of the month so
to speak, and to tear apart one of the great organizations that has served
millions of young men, helped them become men and great fathers, that is just
not appropriate and I hope the American people will stand up and say, ‘Not on
my watch’…And if we change and become more like Pop Culture, young men will be
not as well served.”
--Gov. Rick Perry, opposing a proposed
change to Boy Scouts eligibility rules for gays.
Pop Culture stroked his grey Van Dyke beard,
which complemented a blue Nehru shirt and grey Birkenstocks, and took another
swig from his craft beer, which the downtown Austin brewery had labeled, “The
Devil’s Eyebrow.”
“That
is one insecure man,” Culture said. “It’s not the first time Rick Perry has
attacked me, but no Texas governor has ever called me out by name like that
before. I had a good relationship with Texas governors. Ann Richards understood me; she got me in a way even my wife, Ma Couture, never has.”
Culture
drained his glass and signaled for a refill.
“Bill Clements and I had a deal: He left
me alone and I didn’t say a thing about the plaid jackets. George W. just ignored me, which was fine because his wife elevated
books and authors.”
“I’m
amazed at Perry,” Culture said, his voice rising. “When he wins another
election, by God the people have spoken. But when he loses the argument, it’s
‘Pop Culture this’ and ‘Pop Culture that.’”
“Why
do you think he’s after you?” I asked, nursing my Perrier.
The rest of the story, subscribers only
By Ed Sills
|
|
Copyright May 15, 2013, Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved
|
|
|
|

|
May 14, 2013      2:08 PM
SCHWERTNER: PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN ON MEDICAID EXPANSION
Oregon model exposes surprising results with implicatgions for Texas
The
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
was sold to the American people on the ambitious
premise that it would improve the health of millions of Americans and save tens
of thousands of lives through preventative care. However, a landmark study published last week
in the New England Journal of Medicine
has cast substantial doubt on this central claim of Obamacare.
In 2008, the
state of Oregon decided to extend Medicaid eligibility to the same population
group that Texas is now considering: low-income, able-bodied adults who are
currently uninsured. Without the funding
to expand coverage to everyone meeting that criteria,
Oregon lawmakers devised a novel solution -- a randomly-selected lottery for
qualified applicants. This lottery
afforded an intriguing opportunity to conduct a large-scale, scientific survey
comparing the 6,387 low-income adults newly enrolled in Medicaid with another
5,842 individuals who remained uninsured.
Though
individuals enrolled in Medicaid utilized 35% more medical services and 15%
more prescription drugs than the uninsured, the Oregon
Health Insurance Experiment found that the Medicaid group's
measurable health outcomes (such as blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood
sugar levels) showed no statistically significant improvement when compared to
the control group. More puzzling still,
the study found no decline in emergency room visits and a 30% increase in
overall hospital admissions.
The rest of the story, subscribers only
By Senator Charles Schwertner, MD
|
|
Copyright May 14, 2013, Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved
|
|
|
|

|
April 24, 2013      11:15 AM
ELTIFE: TIME TO PROPERLY FUND TEXAS TRANSPORTATION
Senator argues more debt for roads is wrong direction; even if it means taxes, the conservative path is to pay as you go
The State of Texas is at
a crossroads, and the decisions we make this Legislative Session will affect
Texans for years to come. We have spent
the last ten years funding a large portion of our transportation needs with
debt, now totaling $13 billion. The
amount of state debt issued in all categories has more than doubled in the last
ten years. You will hear many boast that
we have not raised taxes during this same time, but I would argue that this
debt, coupled with interest, is a tax on future generations. If we do nothing this Legislative Session to
address this debt, it will be the year 2045 before we pay off the $27 billion
in debt plus interest owed for transportation projects.
Coming up with the money
to pay for debt and interest has caused us to fall behind on the funding necessary
to maintain our roads and to pay for new projects. The Texas
Department of Transportation states that we need a minimum of $4
billion more per year to keep up with our transportation needs. There are several options on the table,
including dedicating motor vehicle sales taxes to transportation, increasing
the gas tax, increasing vehicle registration fees, and my proposal, SJR 47,
which would let voters decide whether to temporarily increase the sales tax and
dedicate the revenue to retire our transportation debt. But some in state government are calling for
more debt and believe borrowing some $41 billion more over the next twenty years
is a solution. Some want to sell bonds
with a 100 year maturity. With interest
rates at record lows it is very easy for elected officials to fund government
with debt and avoid raising new revenue.
The rest of the story, subscribers only
|
|
Copyright April 24, 2013, Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved
|
|
|
|

|
April 16, 2013      9:09 AM
MOOREHEAD AND BAYLOR: NUMBERS MATTER-- REAL SAVINGS FOR REAL TEXANS THROUGH PAYDAY LENDING REGULATION
As payday lending bill set to hit the floor, two advocates share the numbers
Numbers
matter in public policy. More often than not, public policy goals are expressed
as magnitudes: we hope for less of a bad thing, or more of a good thing.
Numbers
are especially important when the policy is about money. Is your policy goal to
save people money? The policy results that matter are: how much money got saved
and how many people saved it.
Our
organizations support SB 1247, Sen. Carona’s payday lending reform bill, because the
numbers tell us that it will save lots of borrowers
money. To understand how many borrowers would benefit, and how much money they
would save, it’s necessary to look at the data, which in the case of payday
lending comes from the Office of the Consumer Credit Commissioner (OCCC).
According
to the OCCC, there were 3.6 million payday and auto title loans issued in Texas
in 2012. Borrowers collectively paid $1.25 billion in fees on those loans.
The rest of the story, subscribers only
By Bee Moorehead, Texas Impact; Don Baylor, Center for Public Policy Priorities
|
|
Copyright April 16, 2013, Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved
|
|
|
|

|
April 16, 2013      9:02 AM
MOOREHEAD AND BAYLOR: NUMBERS MATTER-- REAL SAVINGS FOR REAL TEXANS THROUGH PAYDAY LENDING REGULATION
As payday lending bill set to hit the floor, two advocates share the numbers
Numbers
matter in public policy. More often than not, public policy goals are expressed
as magnitudes: we hope for less of a bad thing, or more of a good thing.
Numbers
are especially important when the policy is about money. Is your policy goal to
save people money? The policy results that matter are: how much money got saved
and how many people saved it.
Our
organizations support SB 1247, Sen. Carona’s payday lending reform bill, because the
numbers tell us that it will save lots of borrowers
money. To understand how many borrowers would benefit, and how much money they
would save, it’s necessary to look at the data, which in the case of payday
lending comes from the Office of the Consumer Credit Commissioner (OCCC).
According
to the OCCC, there were 3.6 million payday and auto title loans issued in Texas
in 2012. Borrowers collectively paid $1.25 billion in fees on those loans.
The rest of the story, subscribers only
By Bee Moorehead, Texas Impact; Don Baylor, Center for Public Policy Priorities
|
|
Copyright April 16, 2013, Harvey Kronberg, www.quorumreport.com, All rights are reserved
|
|
|
|

|
|











|